Fresh Stuff on Gender Equality

This article in today’s NY Times, by Philip Cohen (whose excellent blog Family Inequality is right here on WP – check it out), is a welcome reply to the unfortunately premature idea floating around these days that the patriarchy is dead because women have largely achieved equality. How I wish that were true.

And if you need evidence that it’s not true, here’s one recent study showing that when science faculty members examined the exact same two application packages, with the only difference being the applicants’ male versus female identities, the faculty rated the male applicant’s materials significantly higher than the female’s. The study was also published here in Scientific American. So much for scientific objectivity.

Cohen comes at the puzzle of gender inequality from a different angle: he explains that gender equality stalled in the 1990s and has never regained its astonishing momentum from the 1970s and 80s, and he’s got the data to back up his claims. What happened?

Well, read the article for the fine print, but basically it boils down to two things: First, some women have been able to choose careers that were once exclusive to men, but the opposite is not true. On the whole, men have not been breaking down doors to sign up for work traditionally done by women, for obvious reasons – low pay and social stigma. The result is stalled integration of the work force.

Second, the lack of work-family policies in the U.S. punishes mothers by making it insanely difficult, expensive, and stressful for us to have kids and a career (not just jobs outside the home, which most mothers have, but a rewarding career of our choice), for reasons that most people understand. That part is fairly obvious, but Cohen’s attention to the roles and choices of both mothers and fathers is refreshing.

But his solution raises a question: If we had, as he recommends, “family leave, reduced work hours, and public child care,” how much would these benefits truly “unblock the path toward gender equality,” particularly in the light of other data showing that (even) scientists still have deeply entrenched gender bias against women who are just as qualified as their male counterparts?

Which raises another, more general question: how much of gender inequality is rooted in practical difficulties, like lack of affordable child care, and how much of it persists because of ideologies and attitudes that might or might not be driving those practical difficulties?

In an uncomplicated world, we’d be able to find out pretty easily: let’s just be like those humane industrialized countries and institute the work-family policies, and we’d have an obvious, far-reaching point of comparison.

In the world we have, things are a bit messier, but Cohen adds some much-needed seriousness to a conversation that has lately suffered more than its share of sloppy thinking.


6 thoughts on “Fresh Stuff on Gender Equality

    • Discrimination against men is not the top problem (and Cohen does not say that it is, either) because the men can and do choose higher-paying careers. Some women have been able to move into traditionally male-dominated careers, but too many still don’t have that choice and are stuck in the low-paying, high-stigma jobs.

      • Women are stuck in low-wage, high balance jobs to a lesser degree than men are stuck in high-wage, no-balance jobs.

        Men do not have the option to move to low-wage high-balance jobs. This is what Cohen said. This is discrimination against men. This is the issue that needs to be addressed, discrimination against men.

      • If you’ve read the article, you saw that Cohen states clearly, “But most men who can, choose to avoid female arenas.”

        But if you don’t have a NY TImes subscription, you can simply go to Cohen’s blog right here on WordPress (see link above). He posted the article there, too, and I’m sure he’d be happy to help you understand what he means.

  1. I really enjoyed reading your blog after a long time, and as usual, I found it immensely enlightening! I have no idea how things are in the US, but here in India, it is considered absolutely normal that patriarchy is the norm…But, atleast in the urban areas, there are small changes visible…take for instance the recent case which is making headlines here. The editor of a so-called “progressive magazine” which was famous for its investigative journalism and sting operations, was accused by an employee( who happened to be the editor’s daughter’s friend) of molestation. Its a david Vs. Goliath case…but, atleast the woman could dare to complain, which was then taken up by the media…I believe, this would have been much more difficult a decade back…So, even though we have miles to go, atleast there is some progress.

    • The type of incident you describe is not really as uncommon in the U.S. as one might think. But I agree that the ability to speak out does matter. Silence and apathy are the worst. Thanks for stopping by again – always appreciate your comments!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s